Loading articles...

Some want CRTC to ban "discriminatory" basic TV offerings

Last Updated Sep 8, 2016 at 9:49 am PDT

(iStock Photo)
Summary

The four major service providers have spoken at the CRTC hearings underway

Slimmed down cable packages were offered as of March 1st

GATINEAU, QUE. (NEWS 1130) –┬áThe national broadcast regulator should ban TV providers from removing bundling discounts from customers who opt for mandated, cut-rate, basic TV service, according to consumer groups.

The Public Interest Advocacy Centre, testifying at CRTC hearings, says removing the discounts amounts to discrimination and runs contrary to the intent of new rules designed to provide consumers with greater choice and flexibility in buying TV services.

“We believe practices such as the removing of the availability of bundling discounts and of certain services, including video-on-demand and free previews, subject certain basic service subscribers to an undue disadvantage, which is not justified,” PIAC executive director John Lawford told the commission. “These practices deter customers from switching or subscribing to the skinny basic.”

The CRTC is holding hearings this week examining the rollout of so-called skinny basic TV services after receiving hundreds of consumer complaints about how the TV providers were offering the $25 basic packages that were mandated effective March 1st.

Consumers have been disadvantaged by restrictions some of the TV providers imposed on customers who wanted to switch from more expensive channel packages, said PIAC legal counsel Alysia Lau, who argued that cable and satellite companies can’t be counted on to unilaterally change their marketing practices. “The [CRTC] should impose rules that would protect consumer choice,” she said.

But CRTC chairman Jean Pierre Blais questioned why the regulator should force service providers to offer across-the-board discounts, likening the TV pricing models to those offered by the major airlines.

The difference, Lawford says, was that the airlines charge more when they provide more services, while the TV providers were removing discounts from customers simply because they wanted to pay less for essentially the same service for which they were paying higher rates.

The big four service providers — Bell, Shaw, Rogers and Videotron — denied yesterday that they were being “paternalistic” with customers by placing restrictions on the cheapest of their cut-rate TV offerings. But they told the hearings they have learned lessons from the rollout and are adapting their marketing practices in response.

Just hours before the hearings were launched Wednesday, Bell announced it would offer its smallest TV package as a “stand alone” service by early in the New Year.

Lawford welcomed the announcement, but questioned the timing and credited consumer pressure for the move.

Rogers is the parent company of NEWS 1130.